Go to content
Skip menu
PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services  Ship Inspections
PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services
Skip menu
Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships

IMO MASS Code – Technical Implementation & Compliance Consultancy

Independent technical consultancy supporting vessel owners, operators and project teams with MASS Code applicability, implementation, technical assessment, inspection preparation and certification readiness.

IMO MASS Code – A New Regulatory Framework for Autonomous Shipping

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) adopted the International Code of Safety for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS Code) in May 2026. The non-mandatory Code took effect on 1 July 2026 and establishes a goal-based international framework for the safe, secure and environmentally sound operation of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships.

The MASS Code introduces a technical and operational framework for ships in which functions traditionally performed by personnel on board may be performed remotely, autonomously or through advanced automated systems. The implementation of MASS therefore requires consideration of the vessel as an integrated technical, operational and human system.

Technical principle: MASS implementation is not simply the installation of autonomous equipment. The vessel's operational concept, applicable functions, risk controls, communication systems, remote operations, human responsibilities, cybersecurity, failure response and safety performance must be considered as an integrated system.

The IMO MASS framework is intended to supplement existing mandatory maritime safety requirements. MASS vessels remain subject to applicable IMO conventions and other mandatory requirements relevant to their design and operation.

PAMS MASS Code Technical Consultancy

PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services provides independent marine technical consultancy for vessel owners, operators, shipyards and project stakeholders developing or assessing MASS capabilities.

The consultancy approach focuses on technical implementation, verification readiness and structured assessment of the vessel's autonomous and remotely operated functions. The scope can be adapted to the vessel type, degree of autonomy, operational concept, existing automation architecture and applicable Flag Administration and Classification Society requirements.

01

MASS Applicability Assessment

Identification of the vessel functions affected by MASS technologies and determination of the applicable technical and operational assessment scope.

02

MASS Gap Assessment

Comparison of the vessel's existing systems, documentation and operational arrangements against applicable MASS requirements and project objectives.

03

Technical Implementation

Technical review of autonomous functions, remote operations, control systems, navigation, communications, safety systems and supporting infrastructure.

04

Certification Readiness

Preparation support for technical verification, inspection, testing and documentation review by the applicable Flag Administration and/or authorized Recognized Organization.

MASS Operational Concept

MASS implementation begins with understanding how the vessel is intended to operate. The operating concept should identify which functions remain under direct human control, which are automated, which may be remotely controlled and which may be performed autonomously.

Technical Area Implementation Consideration
Operational Concept Definition of intended operating modes, operational limitations, human involvement and system responsibilities.
Navigation Navigation functions, situational awareness, route management, collision avoidance and interaction with other ships and navigational authorities.
Remote Operations Allocation of control functions between the vessel, remote operator and Remote Operations Centre (ROC).
Communications Availability, integrity, redundancy and resilience of communication links required for safe operation.
Autonomous Functions Functions capable of making decisions or initiating actions without direct human intervention.
Failure Response Detection, alarm, mitigation, degraded operation and fallback arrangements following system failures.
Human Element Responsibilities of the master, remote operators, onboard personnel and other responsible persons.

MASS Technical Implementation Process

01

Applicability & Scope

Establish the vessel profile, intended operation, applicable MASS scope and functions affected by autonomous or remote technologies.

02

ConOps & Functional Mapping

Review the Concept of Operations and map critical vessel functions between onboard personnel, remote operators, automated systems and autonomous functions.

03

Risk Assessment

Review hazards associated with loss, degradation or incorrect operation of autonomous, remote-control and supporting technical systems.

04

Technical System Review

Assess navigation, control, propulsion, steering, electrical, communications, monitoring, safety and remote-operation systems.

05

Functional Verification

Review and, where within the agreed consultancy scope, participate in structured demonstrations of normal operating functions and system interfaces.

06

Failure & Fallback Assessment

Evaluate how the MASS responds to communication loss, sensor failure, control failure, power loss and other defined degraded operating conditions.

MASS Technical Assessment Scope

MASS implementation involves multiple interconnected technical disciplines. PAMS can support assessment of the following areas within the agreed project scope.

01

Navigation & Situational Awareness

  • Navigation sensors and position sources.
  • Electronic navigation systems.
  • Situational awareness and sensor integration.
  • Route planning and monitoring.
  • Collision avoidance functions.
  • Navigation alarms and failure indication.
02

Remote Operations & Control

  • Remote control architecture.
  • Remote operator interfaces.
  • Command authority and control transfer.
  • Remote monitoring.
  • Remote operational decision support.
  • Remote Operations Centre arrangements.
03

Connectivity & Communications

  • Ship-to-shore communications.
  • Redundant communication paths.
  • Communication availability monitoring.
  • Loss-of-communication response.
  • Data integrity and transmission reliability.
  • Operational communications supporting safe navigation.
04

Propulsion, Steering & Machinery

  • Propulsion control systems.
  • Steering control and redundancy.
  • Machinery automation.
  • Alarm and monitoring systems.
  • Remote machinery control.
  • Emergency and local control arrangements.
05

Safety & Emergency Functions

  • Fire detection and fire safety systems.
  • Emergency shutdown functions.
  • Damage control arrangements.
  • Emergency communication.
  • Search and rescue considerations.
  • Emergency response without conventional onboard intervention.
06

Cybersecurity & System Integrity

  • Cyber risk identification.
  • Network architecture.
  • Access control.
  • System segregation and protection.
  • Software and configuration management.
  • Cyber incident response and recovery arrangements.

MASS Risk-Based Technical Assessment

Risk assessment is a fundamental element of MASS implementation because autonomous and remote technologies can change how safety-critical functions are performed and how failures are detected and managed.

Assessment principle: The technical assessment should consider not only whether a system performs its intended function, but also what happens when the system, communication link, sensor, power supply, software or human interface becomes unavailable or unreliable.
Assessment Question Technical Consideration
What can fail? Identify equipment, software, communications, sensor, control and human-interface failure modes relevant to the function.
Can the failure be detected? Verify monitoring, alarms, diagnostics and failure indication.
What happens after failure? Determine the automatic response, degraded mode, operator response and fallback condition.
Can safe operation continue? Assess whether the vessel can remain within its operational limitations following the defined failure.
Is human intervention required? Establish who is responsible, where that person is located and how effective intervention is achieved.

MASS Inspection & Verification Approach

PAMS can develop a structured technical inspection programme to support MASS implementation and certification readiness. The detailed survey checklist is developed according to the vessel, approved design, operational concept, applicable requirements and agreed inspection scope.

Documentation Verification

Review of ConOps, system descriptions, risk assessments, drawings, manuals, FMEA documentation, test records, cybersecurity documentation and other relevant technical evidence.

Physical Inspection

Inspection of accessible MASS-related equipment, control systems, sensors, communication equipment, machinery interfaces and operational workstations.

Functional Verification

Review of defined functional tests and demonstrations to establish whether critical functions operate as intended within the agreed verification programme.

Failure & Degraded Mode Review

Assessment of defined failure scenarios, alarms, degraded operation, fallback functions and recovery arrangements.

Inspection methodology: A detailed MASS checklist can be developed progressively from the applicable Code requirements, vessel functions, approved technical documentation and identified risk controls. The resulting inspection instrument may contain document checks, surveyor questions, physical inspection points, functional tests, evidence requirements and close-out records.

MASS Implementation Documentation

Successful implementation requires technical evidence demonstrating how the MASS has been designed, configured, operated and verified. Documentation requirements depend on the vessel and applicable approval framework.

Documentation Technical Purpose
Concept of Operations Defines intended operations, operational modes, responsibilities, limitations and system interaction.
MASS Functional Description Identifies functions performed by onboard personnel, remote operators, automated systems and autonomous systems.
Risk Assessment Identifies hazards, consequences, safeguards and residual risks associated with MASS operation.
System Architecture Defines critical systems, interfaces, dependencies, redundancy and control arrangements.
FMEA / Failure Analysis Establishes system failure modes and their effect on vessel safety and operational capability.
Test & Verification Records Provides evidence that defined functions and failure responses have been tested and verified.
Operational Procedures Defines normal, abnormal, emergency and fallback operating arrangements.

MASS Certification Readiness

The MASS Code introduces a formal framework under which a MASS must complete the applicable approval process and hold a valid MASS Safety Certificate. The statutory approval and certification process remains the responsibility of the applicable Administration and/or authorized certification body.

PAMS technical consultancy can support the owner or project team in preparing for that process by identifying technical gaps, reviewing evidence and organizing the vessel's implementation programme.

01

Pre-Assessment

Establish the current technical and operational status of the MASS project and identify major implementation gaps.

02

Documentation Readiness

Review required technical documentation and identify missing, inconsistent or incomplete evidence.

03

Inspection Preparation

Prepare the vessel and project team for technical inspection, functional demonstrations and verification activities.

04

Close-Out Support

Support technical review of findings, corrective actions and evidence required to demonstrate readiness for the applicable approval process.

Certification boundary: PAMS provides independent technical consultancy and preparation support. Statutory approval, survey and certification remain subject to the requirements and authority of the applicable Flag Administration and/or authorized Recognized Organization.

MASS Technical Reference Framework

MASS implementation should be considered together with the applicable international conventions, codes, classification requirements, cybersecurity requirements and project-specific technical documentation.

IMO MASS Code International Code of Safety for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships, adopted by IMO in 2026 as a non-mandatory goal-based framework.
SOLAS Applicable International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea requirements relevant to the vessel and its operation.
IMO Mandatory Instruments Other applicable IMO conventions, codes and instruments remain relevant to MASS design and operation according to their scope.
Classification Society Requirements Applicable classification rules, notations, technical requirements and approval procedures.
Flag Administration Applicable national requirements, approvals, surveys and statutory certification requirements.
Cyber Risk Management Applicable maritime cybersecurity requirements, risk controls, system protection and operational resilience measures.
Risk-Based Engineering Hazard identification, risk assessment, failure analysis and verification of safety-critical controls.
Testing & Verification Technical testing, system demonstrations, commissioning and verification evidence appropriate to the MASS project.
Standards hierarchy: The applicable requirements must be established for each vessel and project. The MASS Code does not remove the need to comply with other mandatory IMO instruments, applicable Flag requirements or classification requirements.

MASS Implementation – Technical Questions

Technical Question Implementation Focus
What functions are autonomous? Identify functions where system technology performs actions or decisions without direct human intervention.
What functions are remotely controlled? Identify functions controlled from outside the vessel and establish the responsible operator and control architecture.
Who has control? Establish command authority, transfer of control, operator responsibility and intervention arrangements.
What happens if communication is lost? Establish detection, alarm, autonomous response, degraded operation and fallback arrangements.
What happens if a critical sensor fails? Verify redundancy, failure detection, system response and safe continuation or fallback.
Can the vessel be safely recovered? Evaluate emergency, degraded-mode and recovery arrangements for foreseeable failures.

MASS Implementation Case Study

PAMS is developing a structured MASS implementation case study showing how the technical assessment can progress from initial applicability review through system assessment, inspection, functional verification, failure-mode evaluation and final technical readiness review.

The case study is intended to demonstrate the practical progression of MASS implementation rather than reproduce the complete internal surveyor inspection checklist.

Planned case study sequence: MASS applicability → Concept of Operations → functional mapping → documentation review → risk assessment → technical inspection → system verification → failure and degraded-mode assessment → functional testing → findings and close-out → final technical readiness review.
View MASS Implementation Case Study

Independent Technical Oversight

Independent Consultancy

PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services is an independent Philippine technical consultancy providing marine surveying, engineering assessment and maritime regulatory compliance support.

Marine Engineering Experience

Technical work is led by Gregory Apostologlou, Managing Director, Mechanical Engineer, Marine Technical Superintendent and authorized PHRS Surveyor.

Integrated Technical Approach

MASS assessment considers vessel systems, autonomous functions, human responsibilities, communications, risk, cybersecurity and failure response as interconnected technical elements.

Certification Readiness

The consultancy can assist owners and project teams in preparing technical evidence and systems for review by the applicable Flag Administration and authorized Recognized Organization.

About the Technical Author

Gregory Apostologlou

Managing Director of PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services. Mechanical Engineer and Marine Technical Superintendent with international maritime experience in marine surveying, vessel inspections, FPSO/SPM technical engineering, marine risk assessment and maritime regulatory compliance.

Gregory Apostologlou is also an authorized PHRS Surveyor.

Technical Content Review

Last Technical Review

August 2026

Review Frequency

MASS regulatory developments, IMO guidance, classification requirements and technical practices should be reviewed periodically as the international MASS framework develops.

Current regulatory position: The IMO adopted the non-mandatory MASS Code in May 2026 and it took effect on 1 July 2026. The IMO has also established a future pathway toward development of a mandatory MASS Code, with the current experience-building phase forming part of that development process.

IMO MASS Code FAQ

What is the IMO MASS Code?

The IMO MASS Code is the International Code of Safety for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships. It establishes a goal-based framework addressing the safe, secure and environmentally sound operation of ships using autonomous or remote technologies.

When did the MASS Code take effect?

The non-mandatory IMO MASS Code was adopted in May 2026 and took effect on 1 July 2026.

Is the IMO MASS Code mandatory?

The Code adopted in 2026 is non-mandatory. IMO Member States are encouraged to apply it and contribute experience through the MASS Experience-Building Phase while work continues toward a future mandatory framework.

Which vessels are covered by the MASS Code?

The Code applies to cargo ships covered by SOLAS Chapter I. IMO also recommends that Member States apply the Code, as far as practicable, to MASS below 500 gross tonnage.

Does automation alone make a ship a MASS?

No. The IMO explains that enhanced automation alone does not make a ship a MASS. The distinction depends on autonomous or remote technologies replacing or supporting functions normally performed by personnel on board and the vessel completing the applicable approval process.

What does MASS implementation involve?

Implementation can involve operational concept development, functional allocation, risk assessment, system architecture, navigation, remote operations, connectivity, cybersecurity, safety systems, human responsibilities, failure response and technical verification.

Does PAMS issue a MASS Safety Certificate?

No. PAMS provides independent technical consultancy and certification-readiness support. Statutory approval and certification remain subject to the applicable Flag Administration and authorized certification or Recognized Organization process.

Can PAMS perform a MASS technical inspection?

PAMS can provide independent technical assessment and inspection-readiness consultancy within the agreed scope. Statutory survey and certification authority remains with the applicable Administration or authorized Recognized Organization.

Will PAMS have a detailed MASS inspection checklist?

A detailed technical verification checklist can be developed around applicable MASS requirements, vessel functions, technical documentation, physical inspection points, functional testing, evidence requirements and close-out actions. The detailed working checklist is a technical surveyor instrument rather than a replacement for the applicable statutory or classification survey process.

Related Marine Technical Services

Service Description Link
Marine Surveys Independent vessel inspections, condition surveys, technical assessments and marine surveying services. View Marine Surveys
Compliance & Audits ISM, ISPS, MLC, RightShip RISQ 3.2, PSC readiness and maritime regulatory compliance support. View Compliance Services
Marine Technical Consultancy Independent technical risk assessment, engineering consultancy, due diligence and maritime compliance support. View Marine Consultancy
FPSO / Offshore Engineering FPSO, SPM and offshore technical engineering, inspection and project support. View Offshore Engineering

Engineering Reference Notice

This page provides general technical information regarding the IMO MASS Code and the scope of PAMS MASS technical consultancy. The actual requirements applicable to a vessel depend on its type, size, operational concept, degree of autonomous or remote operation, applicable Flag Administration requirements, classification requirements, technical design and project circumstances. This page does not constitute statutory certification, classification approval or legal advice.

Ready to Assess a MASS Project?

Contact PAMS to discuss MASS Code applicability, vessel assessment, technical implementation, inspection preparation or certification readiness for an autonomous or remotely operated vessel.

Request Technical Consultation View Marine Surveys
☰ Technical Services
Back to content