Behavioural Competency Assessment & Verification
Independent assessment and verification of seafarer behavioural competencies, operational decision-making, teamwork, communication, situation awareness and leadership during shipboard operations.
Behavioural Competency Assessment for Vessel Operations
Safe vessel operations depend not only on technical knowledge, qualifications and written procedures, but also on how personnel communicate, coordinate activities, recognize developing risks, make decisions and respond to changing operational conditions.
PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services provides an independent Behavioural Competency Assessment and Verification (BCAV) methodology designed to examine observable behavioural performance within the operational environment of the vessel.
The assessment focuses on observable behaviour rather than personality characteristics. Evidence may be obtained through direct observation, structured interviews, operational scenarios and review of relevant supporting records.
Behavioural Competency Framework
The PAMS assessment structure is based on recognized maritime behavioural competency principles, including the six core competency domains associated with the OCIMF Behavioural Competency Assessment and Verification framework for vessel operators.
Each competency is considered through observable behavioural indicators and operational evidence. The assessment is adapted to the individual's rank, responsibilities, vessel type and operational circumstances.
Team Working
Assessment of how personnel cooperate, coordinate tasks and contribute to effective and safe team performance.
- Cooperation and mutual support.
- Understanding of roles and responsibilities.
- Effective coordination of activities.
- Appropriate cross-checking and challenge.
- Workload sharing and team support.
- Respectful and professional interaction.
Communication & Influencing
Assessment of whether information is communicated clearly, accurately and at the appropriate time.
- Clear operational communication.
- Closed-loop communication.
- Effective questioning.
- Confirmation of understanding.
- Appropriate challenge and escalation.
- Communication during pressure and uncertainty.
Situation Awareness
Assessment of the individual's ability to understand the operational situation, recognize developing hazards and anticipate changing conditions.
- Monitoring of changing conditions.
- Recognition of operational hazards.
- Awareness of vessel and equipment status.
- Recognition of abnormal indications.
- Understanding of operational limitations.
- Anticipation of developing situations.
Decision Making
Assessment of how personnel identify problems, evaluate information, consider risks and select appropriate actions.
- Identification of developing problems.
- Risk-based decision-making.
- Use of available information.
- Consideration of alternative actions.
- Timely escalation.
- Review of decisions when conditions change.
Results Focus
Assessment of the ability to achieve operational objectives while maintaining safety, quality and procedural discipline.
- Appropriate focus on safe completion.
- Planning and preparation.
- Effective prioritization.
- Follow-through on assigned responsibilities.
- Maintenance of operational standards.
- Recognition and rejection of unsafe shortcuts.
Leadership & Managerial Skills
Assessment of how officers and supervisors provide direction, manage personnel, maintain standards and control operational activities.
- Clear direction and expectations.
- Appropriate delegation.
- Effective supervision.
- Management of workload and priorities.
- Coaching and constructive feedback.
- Intervention when safety standards are compromised.
PAMS Behavioural Competency Assessment Methodology
The assessment is designed to establish behavioural evidence through multiple sources rather than relying solely on questionnaires or interviews.
Direct Operational Observation
Personnel are observed during appropriate shipboard activities to establish how behavioural competencies are demonstrated in the operational environment.
- Bridge operations.
- Cargo and transfer operations.
- Mooring and anchoring.
- Engine-room activities.
- Safety-critical activities.
Structured Behavioural Interview
Targeted questions are used to examine experience, judgement, communication, risk recognition and decision-making.
- Experience-based questions.
- Operational decision questions.
- Leadership questions.
- Risk recognition questions.
- Lessons-learned discussions.
Scenario-Based Assessment
Representative scenarios may be used to evaluate behavioural responses to abnormal, changing or safety-critical situations.
- Equipment failure.
- Unexpected weather or environmental change.
- Cargo abnormality.
- Mooring risk escalation.
- Navigation uncertainty.
- Emergency response.
Supporting Evidence Review
Relevant available records may be reviewed to provide additional context and support verification of significant observations.
- Operational records.
- Drill records.
- Risk assessments.
- Near-miss information.
- Training and competency records.
- Relevant maintenance or operational information.
Operational Areas for Behavioural Assessment
Behavioural competencies are best evaluated within the context of actual shipboard operations. The assessment scope can therefore be tailored to vessel type, rank, operational profile and client requirements.
Navigation & Bridge Operations
- Bridge team coordination.
- Passage planning implementation.
- Position and situational monitoring.
- Use and cross-checking of navigation information.
- Challenge and communication between bridge personnel.
- Response to changing navigational conditions.
Cargo, Ballast & Transfer Operations
- Pre-operation planning and briefing.
- Team communication.
- Monitoring of cargo and transfer conditions.
- Recognition of abnormal conditions.
- Coordination with shore personnel.
- Stop-work and escalation behaviour.
Mooring & Anchoring
- Pre-operation briefing.
- Role allocation.
- Communication between stations.
- Recognition of line and snap-back hazards.
- Environmental awareness.
- Leadership during changing conditions.
Engineering Operations
- Engine-room teamwork.
- Effective watch handover.
- Response to machinery abnormalities.
- Alarm recognition and escalation.
- Maintenance coordination.
- Bridge and engine-room communication.
Bunkering & Critical Transfer Operations
- Pre-transfer preparation.
- Communication between involved personnel.
- Risk awareness.
- Monitoring of transfer conditions.
- Spill-prevention behaviour.
- Response to abnormal conditions.
Emergency & Abnormal Situations
- Emergency leadership.
- Prioritization under pressure.
- Communication during uncertainty.
- Situational awareness.
- Delegation and resource management.
- Post-event learning and review.
Positive & Negative Behavioural Indicators
The assessment should record specific observable behaviours rather than relying on generalized statements regarding personality, attitude or character.
| Competency | Positive Behavioural Indicators | Potential Negative Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Team Working | Cooperates with colleagues, shares information, coordinates tasks and accepts appropriate professional challenge. | Works in isolation, withholds information, discourages challenge or fails to coordinate safety-critical tasks. |
| Communication & Influencing | Communicates clearly, confirms understanding and escalates important information appropriately. | Uses ambiguous communication, makes assumptions or delays important information. |
| Situation Awareness | Monitors conditions, identifies hazards and anticipates developing operational risks. | Misses warning signs, becomes excessively task-focused or fails to recognize changing risk. |
| Decision Making | Evaluates available information, considers risk and takes timely and appropriate action. | Delays decisions, relies on unsupported assumptions or accepts inappropriate risk. |
| Results Focus | Achieves operational objectives while maintaining safety and procedural standards. | Prioritizes completion over safety or uses inappropriate operational shortcuts. |
| Leadership & Managerial Skills | Provides direction, delegates effectively, supervises performance and intervenes when necessary. | Provides weak direction, fails to supervise or does not intervene when safety standards deteriorate. |
Behavioural Competency Assessment Rating
PAMS can use a structured assessment scale to establish a competency profile. Each rating should be supported by the available evidence and the assessment opportunity.
| Rating | Assessment Level | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Not Observed | Insufficient opportunity | There was insufficient reliable evidence to make an assessment. |
| Unsatisfactory | Below expected standard | Behaviour does not consistently meet the expected standard for the role. |
| Needs Improvement | Development required | Behavioural weaknesses are evident and require focused development. |
| Meets Expected Standard | Competent | Behaviour consistently meets the expected standard for the role and circumstances. |
| Strong | Consistently strong | Behaviour demonstrates a reliable and strong level of competency. |
| Exemplary | Proactive performance | Behaviour demonstrates advanced awareness, leadership, anticipation and positive influence on team performance. |
Evidence-Based Behavioural Assessment
A credible behavioural assessment should be based on evidence and operational context. PAMS therefore considers the source and quality of evidence supporting significant observations.
Direct Observation
Behaviour observed while personnel perform normal, critical or representative shipboard activities.
Interview Evidence
Responses demonstrating operational understanding, judgement, risk recognition, communication and decision-making.
Scenario Evidence
Behavioural responses to representative abnormal or safety-critical situations.
Documentary Evidence
Appropriate operational, training, drill, risk-assessment or other records that provide relevant supporting context.
Critical Behavioural Risk Indicators
An overall competency profile should not conceal a serious weakness in a safety-critical behavioural area. Certain observations may therefore require specific management attention regardless of the general assessment result.
Failure to Communicate Critical Information
Failure to communicate safety-critical information or delayed communication of developing operational risks.
Inappropriate Risk Acceptance
Continuing an operation despite clearly changing conditions, inadequate controls or significant warning indicators.
Failure to Escalate
Failure to seek assistance or notify the appropriate authority when a situation exceeds available competence, authority or resources.
Suppression of Professional Challenge
Discouraging reasonable questioning, challenge, stop-work intervention or reporting of safety concerns.
Unsafe Shortcuts
Deliberate bypassing of established safety controls for convenience, speed or operational pressure.
Loss of Operational Control
Failure to maintain awareness of critical conditions or coordinate personnel during a developing situation.
PAMS Assessor Approach
Behavioural competency assessment should be conducted professionally, objectively and within a Just Culture environment. The purpose is to identify observable performance, support development and improve operational safety rather than to make unsupported judgments about individual personality.
Objective Observation
Record what was observed and the operational circumstances in which the behaviour occurred.
Operational Context
Consider workload, environmental conditions, vessel condition, operational complexity and available resources.
Evidence Verification
Where practical, corroborate significant observations through interviews, records or other appropriate evidence.
Constructive Feedback
Communicate findings professionally and identify practical opportunities for improvement and development.
Behavioural Competency Assessment Process
Assessment Scope
Establish the vessel type, personnel, ranks, operational areas, competency requirements and assessment objectives.
Pre-Assessment Review
Review available vessel information, procedures, competency requirements and relevant operational documentation.
Operational Observation
Observe selected personnel during appropriate shipboard activities and record behavioural evidence.
Behavioural Interview
Conduct structured questions and representative scenarios to assess judgement, communication, risk awareness and leadership.
Evidence Verification
Compare significant observations with relevant supporting information and available operational evidence.
Competency Profile
Establish strengths, development needs and any critical behavioural concerns requiring management attention.
Behavioural Competency Assessment Deliverables
Behavioural Competency Report
Structured report presenting the assessment scope, methodology, competency findings and significant behavioural observations.
Competency Profile
Clear assessment of the principal behavioural competency areas relevant to the individual's role and operational duties.
Evidence-Based Findings
Significant findings supported by direct observation, interviews, scenarios or appropriate supporting evidence.
Development Recommendations
Practical recommendations addressing identified behavioural development needs, coaching opportunities or additional training requirements.
What Behavioural Competency Assessment Helps Determine
Team Effectiveness
Whether operational teams communicate, coordinate and support one another effectively during shipboard activities.
Operational Decision-Making
Whether decisions demonstrate appropriate risk recognition, situational awareness and timely escalation.
Leadership Performance
Whether officers and supervisors provide appropriate direction, delegation, supervision and intervention.
Communication Quality
Whether important information is communicated, understood and escalated effectively.
Safety Culture Indicators
Whether personnel support professional challenge, reporting, learning and safe operational practices.
Development Priorities
Identification of practical areas for coaching, mentoring, training or additional supervised operational development.
Relationship with ISM, SIRE 2.0 & TMSA
Behavioural competency assessment can support a company's broader human-factor, safety-management and operational-readiness activities. It provides management with additional insight into how personnel apply procedures, communicate, make decisions and manage operational risk.
ISM Implementation
Supports examination of how safety-management procedures and responsibilities are applied during actual operations.
SIRE 2.0 Readiness
Can support preparation by identifying behavioural, communication, leadership and operational implementation gaps.
TMSA Development
Can contribute to management initiatives relating to competency, leadership, safety culture and operational performance.
Human Factors
Provides a structured approach to identifying behavioural factors that can influence operational performance and risk.
Technical & Industry Reference Framework
Depending on the agreed scope, PAMS may consider applicable maritime regulations, competency requirements and recognized industry guidance.
Who Can Benefit from Behavioural Competency Assessment?
Shipowners
Independent assessment of operational behaviour and competency development priorities across vessel personnel.
Ship Managers
Support safety management, leadership development and operational readiness initiatives.
Technical Managers
Assessment of engineering-team communication, decision-making, leadership and response to abnormal conditions.
Marine Assurance Teams
Independent assessment of behavioural and operational readiness within an agreed assurance programme.
Training & Development Departments
Identification of competency gaps that may benefit from targeted coaching, mentoring or training.
Specialized Vessel Operators
Behavioural assessment adapted to complex, offshore and safety-critical vessel operations.
Independent Technical Oversight
Independent Consultancy
PAMS Pacific Admiralty Maritime Services provides independent marine surveying, marine engineering and maritime technical consultancy.
Technical Experience
PAMS technical activities are led by Gregory Apostologlou, Managing Director, Mechanical Engineer and Marine Technical Superintendent.
Evidence-Based Assessment
Behavioural findings are based on observable performance, operational context and available supporting evidence.
Practical Development
Findings are intended to help management identify practical opportunities for coaching, development, training and improved operational performance.
About the Technical Author
Technical Content Review
Technical Review
September 2026
Review Scope
Content is reviewed periodically to reflect applicable maritime regulations, recognized industry guidance, behavioural competency principles and developments in shipboard operational practice.
Behavioural Competency Assessment FAQ
What is Behavioural Competency Assessment and Verification?
Behavioural Competency Assessment and Verification is a structured approach for assessing how personnel demonstrate behavioural competencies during shipboard operations. It considers teamwork, communication, situation awareness, decision-making, results focus and leadership.
What are the six core behavioural competency areas?
The six core areas are Team Working, Communication and Influencing, Situation Awareness, Decision Making, Results Focus, and Leadership and Managerial Skills.
How does PAMS assess behavioural competency?
Assessment may combine direct operational observation, structured interviews, scenario-based questioning and review of appropriate supporting evidence.
Is the PAMS assessment an official OCIMF inspection?
No. PAMS provides an independent technical assessment based on recognized maritime behavioural competency principles and relevant industry guidance. It is not an official OCIMF inspection or certification.
Can BCAV be conducted onboard a vessel?
Yes. Subject to the agreed scope and operational conditions, behavioural competency assessment can be integrated with appropriate onboard activities.
Can the assessment be adapted to different vessel types?
Yes. The assessment can be adapted according to vessel type, operational profile, rank, responsibilities, critical activities and client requirements.
Can BCAV support SIRE 2.0 readiness?
Behavioural competency assessment can support wider human factor, operational and safety-culture initiatives associated with inspection readiness. It does not replace an official SIRE inspection or guarantee an inspection outcome.
What happens if a serious behavioural weakness is identified?
Significant behavioural concerns should be documented with the available evidence and addressed through the applicable management process. Depending on the finding, corrective action, coaching, training, supervision or reassessment may be appropriate.
Is behavioural competency the same as technical competency?
No. Technical competency concerns the knowledge and skills required to perform a task, while behavioural competency concerns how personnel apply those capabilities through communication, teamwork, judgement, situation awareness, decision-making and leadership.
Related Behavioural Competency Resources
| Resource | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Competency Case Study | Practical case study illustrating the application of behavioural competency assessment within a maritime operational environment. | View Case Study |
| Behavioral Competency Project | PAMS behavioural competency project covering operational assessment, competency verification and technical evaluation. | View Project |
| Behavioural Competency Assessment and Verification | Related PAMS technical article covering behavioural competency assessment and verification in maritime operations. | Read Technical Article |
Engineering Reference Notice
Behavioural Competency Assessment and Verification is an independent technical assessment service. The PAMS methodology is intended to support competency development, operational risk awareness, safety culture and management decision-making. It does not constitute statutory certification, an official OCIMF inspection, SIRE inspection, Flag State inspection, classification survey or TMSA assessment. The assessment scope and criteria should be agreed with the client according to vessel type, personnel responsibilities, operational conditions and available evidence.
Request a Behavioural Competency Assessment
Contact PAMS to discuss an independent Behavioural Competency Assessment and Verification programme for vessel personnel, operational teams, officers, specialized vessels or maritime management development requirements.
Request Technical Consultation View Compliance Services